FBR Property Valuation Tables 2026 — 5 Cities
Lahore, Karachi, Sialkot, Peshawar and Hyderabad, transcribed row by row from FBR's own SRO PDFs — plus Islamabad and Rawalpindi, already on this site.
Short answer: Lahore, Karachi, Sialkot, Peshawar and Hyderabad FBR property valuation tables, extracted row by row from FBR's own 2026 SRO PDFs.
Direct line: Muhammad Hasnain, plot specialist for Bahria Enclave & DHA Margalla Enclave — WhatsApp 0300 0399322. Verified before you pay; drawbacks in writing.
The FBR "Valuation of Immovable Properties" notification sets the floor every property tax in Pakistan is computed on — not your negotiated price, and not the price your seller tells you. Whichever is higher, your declared value or this FBR figure, is what §236C (seller), §236K (buyer) and Capital Gains Tax get calculated against. We already publish the Islamabad and Rawalpindi ladders; this page adds five more cities, extracted row by row from FBR's own SRO PDFs rather than copied from a summary.
What the FBR value actually decides
- §236K (buyer's advance tax) and §236C (seller's advance tax) are both computed on the higher of your declared/DC value and this FBR figure — see the worked examples on each city page, using the same rates as our Taxes & Transfer Costs guide.
- Capital Gains Tax on a sale uses the same recorded-value logic.
- Stamp duty is a separate, provincial charge (not FBR's) computed on the province's own DC/registration valuation — we do not print a number for it here because it varies by province.
Cities on this table
| City | Province | Rows extracted | Base SRO | Gazetted |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lahore | Punjab | 1365 | S.R.O. 1722(I)/2024 | 2024-10-29 |
| Karachi | Sindh | 235 | S.R.O. 1724(I)/2024 | 2024-10-29 |
| Sialkot | Punjab | 1754 | S.R.O. 1712(I)/2024 | 2024-10-29 |
| Peshawar | Khyber Pakhtunkhwa | 342 | S.R.O. 1710(I)/2024 | 2024-10-29 |
| Hyderabad | Sindh | 226 | S.R.O. 1717(I)/2024 | 2024-10-29 |
Already published, same format: Islamabad (per square yard) and Rawalpindi (per square foot).
Attempted, not yet a page
Four cities' base SROs price land at individual khasra/parcel level (thousands of rows per mauza, one value column instead of the open-plot/structure pairs used everywhere else here) rather than the scheme/area level every other table on this site uses, and one city's SRO PDF is a scanned image with no text layer. Extraction was attempted honestly and stopped rather than guessed at:
| City | Base SRO | Why no page yet |
|---|---|---|
| Faisalabad | SRO 1688(I)/2024 (base) / 651(I)/2026 | downloaded and inspected (~57,900 rows across 3,612 pages, individual khasra/parcel level) but not yet extracted or built into a page; the row shape does not match the scheme-level table this cluster is built around. |
| Multan | SRO 1729(I)/2024 / 650(I)/2026 | downloaded and inspected (~13,600 rows, mauza + classification + location, one value column per row rather than the open-plot/structure pairs used everywhere else on this site) but not yet extracted. |
| Gujranwala | SRO 1691(I)/2024 / 653(I)/2026 | downloaded and inspected (~6,165 rows, same khasra-level shape as Multan) but not yet extracted. |
| Bahawalpur | SRO 1730(I)/2024 / 652(I)/2026 | downloaded and inspected (~3,950 rows, khasra-level with a Killa No. column) but not yet extracted. |
| Quetta | SRO 1444(I)/2026 | downloaded -- the base SRO PDF is a scanned image; pdftotext returns garbled OCR noise, not a text layer. Unreadable without re-keying it by hand from the image. |
Fetched and extracted 12 September 2026. Every city page below cites its own source PDF and fetch date.
Confirm your exact FBR value
Send the city, town/mauza and plot size. The current FBR figure and the full §236K/§236C tax stack come back before you pay, not after.