Two websites selling the same Margalla Orchard commercial plot quote it as
“PKR 9 Crore 10 Lac” and “PKR 91 Lac”. That is not a negotiating range;
it is a factor-of-ten error sitting live on the open internet, and a buyer who reads the wrong one
builds an entire budget around a number that is off by 900%. Start there, because it tells you
exactly how much care this scheme’s published pricing deserves.
The honest summary. Residential (10 Marla / 14 Marla / 1 Kanal) is a resale market quoted
on cash terms — there is no official residential instalment plan for an outside buyer,
because allotment balloting closed in September 2022. The commercial zone, Margalla Orchards
Walk, did run a real DHA instalment ladder of up to three years. Every number below carries its
source and its date, and where sources disagree we show both.
Asking prices — every size, counted
These are live listings read on 25 August 2026 across Zameen, Lamudi and Graana, with the
listing count next to each band so you can see how much evidence sits behind it. One caution up front:
Zameen and Lamudi carry the same syndicated pool — their counts match almost exactly
(14 Marla 34 and 34, 1 Kanal 233 and 232) — so this is one market being counted once, not two markets
agreeing.
| Size | Dimensions | Asking band | Live listings | Note |
| 10 Marla | 32×70 ft · 250 sq yd | 2.00 – 2.52 Cr |
110 | Graana's single listing sits at 1.95 Cr — just below the floor. |
| 14 Marla | 40×80 ft · ~356 sq yd | 1.85 – 2.52 Cr |
34 | Tightest cluster in the scheme: most sit 2.10–2.25 Cr. |
| 1 Kanal | 50×90 ft · 500 sq yd | 3.00 – 3.80 Cr |
233 | Long tail: individual asks run down to 2.15 Cr and up to 4.50 Cr. |
| 5 Marla commercial | 133.33 sq yd · Orchards Walk | 9.00 – 11.00 Cr |
24 | A few corner/park-facing asks reach 16.04 Cr. |
| 8 Marla commercial | 200 sq yd · Orchards Walk | 15.54 – 16.00 Cr |
9 | Very tight cluster at ~16 Cr. |
Asking prices only, read from live listings on 25 August 2026. No transacted (registry-verified)
sale price exists in any public source we could find for this scheme. Zameen and Lamudi carry the same
syndicated pool — their counts match almost exactly — so the listing numbers are one pool, not two.
Read those as asking prices, and nothing more. Across four portals we found
no transacted, registry-verified sale price for this scheme — not one. Anyone quoting you
“the market rate” is quoting an ask with the caveats stripped off. Graana’s single 1 Kanal
listing at 1.95–3.05 Cr sits below the Zameen/Lamudi cluster, but it is three months stale and n=1, so we
flag it rather than average it in.
The stat that actually tells you something: who is selling
Asking prices are noisy. Supply is not. Put the approved layout plan’s own plot counts next to today’s
listings and a much sharper picture appears — and because the two smaller sizes are quota-exclusive, it tells
you which group of allottees is heading for the exit:
| Size | Plots in the approved LOP | Live listings | Share of stock on the market | Whose quota |
| 1 Kanal (50×90) | 3,104 | 233 |
7.5% | FGEHA 1,188 + SCBA 1,916 |
| 14 Marla (40×80) | 900 | 34 |
3.8% | FGEHA quota only |
| 10 Marla (32×70) | 777 | 110 |
14.2% | SCBA quota only |
14 Marla is FGEHA-quota-only and 3.8% of it is listed. 10 Marla is SCBA-quota-only and 14.2% of it is
listed. The lawyers’ allocation is being offered at roughly 3.7 times the rate of
the federal employees’. Dawn reported over Rs 6 billion deposited by SCBA members into a scheme that had not
been delivered before DHA joined in September 2025 — a six-year wait, and an exit that opened the moment DHA
arrived. Caveats stated plainly: these are listings not sales, 1 Kanal spans both quotas so it cannot be
attributed, and the counts come from one syndicated pool. Full working on the
map and blocks page.
Read that table as three different kinds of number, not one. The marketing-site
ranges are a seller’s published position from March 2026. The Zameen figures are
asking prices from live listings in August 2026 — what people want, not what anyone
paid. We found no transacted, registry-verified sale price for this scheme from any source.
Anyone quoting you “the market rate” as a single confident number is quoting an asking
price with the caveats removed.
Note also the 10 Marla spread: a marketing range starting at 2.00 Cr against live listings starting
at 1.24 Cr. A gap that wide usually means block differences, development-charge status, or distressed
sellers — and it means the sector-level average is close to useless for pricing your
specific plot.
Is there a payment plan? Split the question in two.
Residential: no instalment plan for outside buyers
Both major marketing sites state residential plots are full cash payment only, with
one explaining that “active development has driven down the availability of installments.”
The structural reason is simpler than the marketing reason: you are buying from an original
allottee, not from the authority. The instalment history belongs to FGEHA and SCBAP members
who paid in from 2019 onward — Dawn reported over Rs 6 billion deposited by lawyers before DHA
even joined. That instalment ladder is not transferable to you.
Treat cash-only as a liquidity caveat, not a prestige feature, whatever the brochure
says. It shrinks your buyer pool when you come to sell, and it is the single biggest practical
difference from Margalla Enclave, where a published instalment schedule is part of the official
product.
Commercial: a real, structured DHA plan
Margalla Orchards Walk ran a proper ladder — and this is the part of the scheme with the
clearest published terms:
- Processing fee (non-refundable): PKR 40,000 for 5 Marla, PKR 50,000 for 8 Marla
- Down payment: 5% of sale price, within 45 days of successful ballot allotment
- Confirmation payment: 15%, within 60 days of allotment
- Balance: lump sum, or 1-year (4 quarterly), 2-year (8 quarterly), or 3-year (12 quarterly)
- Application deadline 13 Feb 2026; ballot held 18 Feb 2026 at DHA Phase II Imperial Hall
Full detail, including the 10x price conflict and the later DHA window, is on our
Margalla Orchards Walk guide.
The 10x conflict — now settled by the live market. Two dealer sites publish the same commercial
plots ten times apart: one says 5 Marla from PKR 9.10 Crore, 8 Marla from PKR 14 Crore; the other says
91 Lac and 1.40 Crore. On 25 August 2026 we counted 35 live commercial listings across Zameen
and Lamudi, and they run PKR 9.0 to 16.04 Crore, clustering hard at ~10.5 Crore for 5 Marla and ~16 Crore
for 8 Marla. That settles it: the Crore figures are right and the “91 Lac” figure is a
Crore-for-Lac error — off by a factor of ten on a purchase this size. A separate social-media post
quoting “ballotted” prices of 35–45 Lac reconciles with neither; ignore it. We still could not
read DHA’s own portal (it returned HTTP 400 behind a Cloudflare challenge every way we tried on 25 Aug), so
confirm the official figure there before you transfer anything.
Transfer fees and what completion actually costs
Marketing sources publish the following transfer charges, processed at the FGEHA office in G-10,
Islamabad:
| Size | Transfer fee |
| 10 Marla | PKR 150,000 |
| 14 Marla | PKR 225,000 |
| 1 Kanal | PKR 280,000 |
These are not itemised, and that is a problem you should solve before you commit. It
is not stated whether federal tax and any authority charges are bundled inside those figures or sit on
top of them — and the difference on a 1 Kanal plot runs well into seven figures. Get the
breakdown in writing from the FGEHA transfer counter, not from a dealer.
Federal taxes on top — and one rate we are openly unsure about
§236C: we checked our own number, and we are flagging it. Across this site we have
described §236C as a flat 2.75% for filers and ~11% for non-filers under the Finance Act 2026,
with the slabs and the late-filer category abolished. That is what most Pakistani property sites say.
On 25 August 2026 we went to check it against a primary source and could not confirm it.
FBR’s own advance-tax FAQ, fetched that day, still publishes the tiered Finance Act 2025
table — and still lists a late-filer category:
| §236C — seller, on gross consideration | Filer | Late filer | Non-filer |
| Up to PKR 50 million | 4.5% | 7.5% | 11.5% |
| PKR 50–100 million | 5% | 8.5% | 11.5% |
| Above PKR 100 million | 5.5% | 9.5% | 11.5% |
| §236K — buyer, on fair market value | Filer | Late filer | Non-filer |
| Up to PKR 50 million | 1.5% | 4.5% | 10.5% |
| PKR 50–100 million | 2% | 5.5% | 14.5% |
| Above PKR 100 million | 2.5% | 6.5% | 18.5% |
So which is right? Honestly: we do not yet know, and neither does anyone else who is publishing
a confident number. The FBR page is labelled “Finance Act, 2025” and carries no date of its own,
so it may simply be stale. But the flat 2.75% figure traces back through a chain of undated dealer blogs
to what appears to be a pre-budget proposal article — whose own proposed numbers were different
again. Nobody we can find cites an SRO or gazette number for it. The documents that would settle it
are FBR SRO 644(I)/2026 (16 Apr 2026) and its amendment SRO 1335(I)/2026 (7 Aug 2026); we are
going after them and will update this block, dated, the day we have read them.
What to do in the meantime. If you are transacting now, get the rate in writing from the transfer
counter or your tax adviser on the day — not from any website, ours included. The gap between 2.75%
and 5.5% on a 10-Crore sale is roughly PKR 27.5 lakh, which is far too much to take on trust.
What we are confident about, and why:
CGT is a flat 15% on property acquired on or after 1 July 2024, with no holding-period relief;
property acquired before that date keeps the old taper (0% after 2 years for flats, 4 for constructed
property, 6 for open plots), and the regime is fixed by acquisition date, not sale date.
§7E is dead — struck down as unconstitutional (ruling 7 May 2026, void ab initio) and
omitted by the Finance Act 2026 from 1 July 2026; if anyone asks you for a 7E certificate, that request
is out of date. And per FBR’s own FAQ, a non-resident NICOP/POC holder gets the filer rate even
if they are a non-filer, provided they stayed under 183 days in Pakistan — a genuinely valuable
relief that is widely missed.
Nothing about this scheme exempts it from the federal regime, which changed materially this year.
The essentials, as they apply to a Margalla Orchard resale:
- Section 236C (seller side) is now a flat 2.75% for filers and
roughly 11% for non-filers. The old slab structure and the late-filer category are
gone. Most content still online describes the old slabs.
- Capital Gains Tax is a flat 15% only on plots acquired on or after
1 July 2024. Plots acquired before that date remain on the older six-year taper that runs to
0%. This matters unusually much here: original allotments trace to 2019–2022, so an original
FGEHA or SCBAP member selling to you is very likely on the old regime, while you, buying in
2026, will be on the flat 15% when you eventually sell. That is our reading of the rule applied to
this scheme's timeline — confirm your own position with your tax adviser.
- Section 7E is repealed. If anyone asks you for a 7E certificate, that request is
out of date.
Our seller-side tax guide and
buyer-side cost guide work through the numbers, and the
cost calculator will total them for a given price.
One genuinely unresolved item: the correct ICT stamp duty rate. One source states it
was cut to 1% for filers; another applies roughly 3% of FBR value. We could not find a primary
notification to settle it, so we are not publishing a rate. Ask the transfer counter on the day —
and if a dealer states a rate confidently, ask which notification they are reading.
What the price tells you about the market
414 live listings on Zameen and 360 on Lamudi (both checked 25 Aug 2026) is a
surprisingly deep resale market for a scheme whose DHA-branded phase is under a year old. The most
likely explanation is straightforward: original 2019-era allottees are taking profit now that
DHA’s involvement has de-risked the project in buyers’ eyes. Presence on Graana, Ilaan and
Aarz is thin to absent — so a single portal is doing most of the price discovery here, which is
itself a reason to treat any headline “market rate” with suspicion.
On relative value against schemes we cover: Margalla Orchard’s quoted ranges sit
above Park View City and below DHA Margalla Enclave and Park Enclave for comparable
sizes. It is not the cheapest entry to this corridor and it is not the premium one — it is a
middle position whose main distinguishing product is the 14 Marla size that neither Margalla
Enclave nor Bahria Enclave offers.
Sources for this section
- Residential ranges and transfer fees: marketing site (Souq al’Ard Pvt Ltd, self-declared authorised dealer, not DHA's official site) — page modified 9 Mar 2026, read 25 Aug 2026.
- Live asking prices and 414 listing count: Zameen.com Margalla Orchard society page — scraped 25 Aug 2026.
- Commercial payment ladder, processing fees, ballot dates: DHA-focused marketing site — read 25 Aug 2026; conflicting figures published by a second marketing site the same day.
- Rs 6bn deposited by lawyers before DHA joined: Dawn — 27 Sep 2025.
- Tax positions: Finance Act 2026 — §236C flat 2.75% filer / ~11% non-filer, CGT 15% flat on post-1-Jul-2024 acquisitions, §7E repealed.