Short answer: Two different laws. Punjab's Act IX of 2025 stops at the provincial border; federal Act XXVIII of 2024 is the one covering Islamabad. Both PDFs linked.
Direct line: Muhammad Hasnain, plot specialist for Bahria Enclave & DHA Margalla Enclave — WhatsApp 0300 0399322. Verified before you pay; drawbacks in writing.
Here is what every page ranking for “Overseas Pakistanis Property Act 2025” gets wrong:
there is no single act by that name. There are two separate, real laws, passed a few months
apart at two different levels of government — and which one protects your plot depends entirely on where
the plot is. If your property is in Islamabad — Bahria Enclave, DHA Margalla Enclave, any ICT sector —
the law that covers you is the federal Act of 2024, not the Punjab Act of 2025 that most search
results describe. We verified both from the official law repositories and assembly records; here is the whole
picture, dated.
Both Acts, as PDFs, direct from the official repositories
The most common thing people search on this topic is the PDF, and most pages that promise
one hand you a dealer’s paraphrase. These are the statutes themselves, on the governments’ own
servers. We opened both on 1 September 2026 and every figure on this page is read out of them.
If a search result sends you to punjablaws.gov.pk/laws/2907.html,
it is broken — that URL now returns 404. The live path is the lawspdf/2907.pdf one above.
Half the pages ranking for this query still link the dead one.
The two laws, side by side
| Federal — covers Islamabad | Punjab — covers the whole province |
| Official title | Establishment of Special Court (Overseas Pakistanis Property) Act, 2024 | The Punjab Establishment of Special Courts (Overseas Pakistanis Property) Act 2025 |
| Passed by | Senate 17 Oct 2024 (unanimous), then the National Assembly; signed into law late Oct 2024 | Punjab Assembly 20 Jan 2025; assent 29 Jan 2025, Punjab Gazette (Extraordinary) 29 Jan 2025, pp. 2711–17 — certified from the statute’s own footnote, 1 Sep 2026 |
| Territory | The entire Islamabad Capital Territory — stated explicitly | Punjab’s districts only — Rawalpindi yes, Islamabad no |
| Courts | IHC special bench + designated District & Sessions Judges for Islamabad East and West | District & Additional Sessions Judges designated as Special Court Judges across Punjab; every appointment routed through the Chief Justice of the Lahore High Court (s.3) — which has no ICT jurisdiction |
| Covers your plot if… | it is in Bahria Enclave, Margalla Enclave, or anywhere in ICT | it is in Bahria Town Rawalpindi, DHA Rawalpindi side, or elsewhere in Punjab |
Sources: pakistancode.gov.pk (official federal statute repository) · pap.gov.pk, the
Punjab Assembly’s own bill tracker · Ministry of Overseas Pakistanis (ophrd.gov.pk) and Business
Recorder on the ICT jurisdiction clause · Dawn, 18 Oct 2024 on the Senate passage. Read 29 Aug 2026.
If your plot is in Islamabad: the federal special court, and it is running
The federal Act gives its special court jurisdiction “over the entire Islamabad Capital
Territory” — the ministry’s own announcement and independent press coverage both carry
that phrase. And this is not a paper court: 2026 reporting describes the machinery constituted and operating
— the Islamabad High Court set up a special bench (headed by Justice Khadim Hussain Soomro), and two
District & Sessions Judges were designated for Islamabad East and Islamabad West. For a
Bahria Enclave or Margalla Enclave owner, that is the door.
Three design features matter to someone sitting in Manchester or Toronto:
- E-filing — the case can be lodged without travelling to Pakistan.
- Video-link evidence, supervised by your Pakistani mission — testimony is taken with
the High Commission / consulate’s supervision, so “come to Pakistan for every hearing” stops
being the weapon it used to be.
- A 90-day disposal target — but read the clock properly. Section 9(1) runs the
90 days from the date leave to defend is granted, not from the day you file. And s.10(5) allows
no appeal against a decision granting or refusing leave. So the stage that actually decides how fast
your case moves is the leave-to-defend stage, together with the security the defendant must furnish. Every page
that says “cases decided in 90 days” is quoting the press release; the statute says something more
specific. As of September 2026 there is still no public performance data on whether the courts hit the
target, and we won’t pretend otherwise.
The Punjab Act 2025 — the one everybody searches for
Punjab’s version is the newer law and the one that dominates search results — which is exactly
why overseas owners of Islamabad plots keep reading the wrong statute. Passed by the Punjab Assembly on
20 January 2025, it stands up special courts across the province, staffed by designated
District & Additional Sessions Judges, with the same overseas-friendly mechanics.
Two things we can now certify that we previously could not. First, the date: assent
29 January 2025, published in the Punjab Gazette (Extraordinary) of the same day at
pages 2711–17 — taken from the statute’s own footnote, read 1 September 2026. Second, and more
useful, the extent clause. Section 1(2) says only: “It extends to whole of the
Punjab.” We used to write “37 districts” here, following the press coverage. The Act does
not say that, so neither will we — and the correction does not change the conclusion for you: the Islamabad
Capital Territory is not part of the Province of Punjab, so this statute cannot reach your Islamabad plot.
The 182-day test nobody mentions
Every article about this Act says overseas Pakistanis can now sue. Almost none quotes the definition that
decides whether you qualify. Section 2(c), verbatim:
“Overseas Pakistani” means any person holding a Pakistani passport, computerized
national identity card (CNIC), National Identity Card for Overseas Pakistanis (NICOP), Pakistan Origin Card
(POS) or Overseas Pakistani Foundation (OPF) membership card proving his nationality and is living, working or
studying abroad permanently or temporarily for more than one hundred and eighty two (182) days in a tax
year.
A NICOP on its own is not the test. You must also be abroad for more than 182 days in a tax
year. If you split your year between Islamabad and Dubai, count your days before you count on this court.
(And yes — the gazetted text really does print “Pakistan Origin Card (POS)”.
It should read POC. We mention it because it is the kind of thing you only notice by opening the statute.)
One genuinely important development came later: some Punjab special courts initially read their jurisdiction
narrowly — taking possession and qabza cases but bouncing inheritance, specific-performance, cancellation
and power-of-attorney disputes back to the ordinary civil courts, which would have gutted the law’s point.
In a ruling reported 7 May 2026, the Lahore High Court (Justice Anwaar Hussain) shut that down:
the special courts have jurisdiction over “all matters having nexus with such immovable
property” whenever an overseas Pakistani is a party — plaintiff or defendant. If a lawyer
or opposing party tells you your inheritance or POA dispute “doesn’t qualify”, that ruling is
the answer.
What these courts actually hear
The target list is the classic overseas-Pakistani nightmare file: illegal possession (qabza),
fraudulent transfers executed while you were abroad, and — after the LHC ruling —
the full ring of disputes connected to the property: inheritance shares, cancellation of forged instruments,
specific performance, POA abuse. If you are reading this before a purchase rather than after a fraud,
take the cheaper lesson: every one of these cases begins with a verification step someone skipped. Our
five-check verification and a
tightly-drafted special POA are how you avoid ever meeting these judges.
What we could not verify — and therefore will not claim.
(1) The statutes’ exact definition of “overseas Pakistani” — whether NICOP/POC is the
formal eligibility test — because neither official repository would serve the full operative text; we
publish the mechanics that are multiply-sourced and leave the definition to your lawyer. (2) Any case-count or
success-rate data for either court system — none has been published. (3) The exact federal assent date
beyond “late October 2024”. Pages asserting these things confidently are guessing.
Where the official text lives (and the PDF trap)
The federal Act’s authoritative entry is on pakistancode.gov.pk, the government’s
statute repository; the Punjab Act is listed on punjablaws.gov.pk and its legislative record on
pap.gov.pk (Bill No. 09 of 2025). If you want the text, go there directly. A cottage industry of
dealer pages now offers “Overseas Pakistani Property Act 2025 PDF download” — some are fine
scans, some are summaries dressed as statute, and at least a few confuse the federal and Punjab laws in the very
first paragraph. Read the source, not the reseller.
Complaints without litigation
Not every problem needs a courtroom. The Overseas Pakistanis Foundation runs a free complaint channel —
[email protected], the OPF online complaint system (opf.pitb.gov.pk), the Pakistan
Citizen’s Portal, or any Pakistani mission abroad. For dues disputes, transfer-office stonewalling and
records issues, that route costs nothing and creates a paper trail a later case can use.
The honest bottom line for an Islamabad owner
You now have something overseas owners did not have three years ago: a dedicated court for your plot, in the
territory your plot actually sits in, designed so you can pursue it from abroad. It is real, it is constituted,
and it is new enough that nobody can honestly tell you how fast it runs. Use it if you must — but the
better use of this page is upstream: sell properly through a
verified process, buy through verification, and structure your
POA so there is never a dispute to file.